Transvaginal mesh cases are mounting. In fact, more than 58,000 are pending in America’s courts at this very moment. If you have experienced complications as a result of the implant, you are not alone. All over the country, plaintiffs contend that they did not receive sufficient warning of the health risks involved and are now left to endure the physical and emotional repercussions.
Thousands of women who hoped the netlike device would correct a pelvic organ prolapse (POP) or alleviate stress urinary incontinence (SUI) submitted to surgery in good faith, trusting that the transvaginal mesh to be implanted in their bodies would bring permanent relief for their suffering. Instead, they unknowingly subjected themselves to serious complications.
For numerous patients, the implant produces problems like mesh erosion, pelvic hemorrhage, or bladder perforation. Many women and their partners find their love lives in shambles following the procedure, due to painful intercourse. Others still require additional surgeries to remove the implants and repair the damage left in their wake, resulting in even more physical pain, emotional trauma, and mental anguish.
If any of these manifestations sound familiar, you may want to consider speaking with a defective product lawyer—preferably one with experience in handling transvaginal mesh cases. The attorney will examine the evidence and advise you of your rights on moving forward with filing a case.
If you recently stopped taking Cymbalta and experienced withdrawal side effects, you are not alone. The Food and Drug Administration reports that compared to patients who discontinued Paxil or Effexor, three times as many Cymbalta users looked to Google for help with withdrawal symptoms. Each of these medications is used to treat depression, but discontinuation problems appear to be much more prevalent and severe with Cymbalta.
Patients and physicians alike claim that they did not receive enough information to warn them of the frequency and severity of Cymbalta withdrawal side effects. Patients often lay the blame on doctors. However, physicians, in turn, maintain that neither the drug maker (Eli-Lilly), nor the company’s sales representatives, nor marketing materials sufficiently stated the potential dangers involved in stopping the medication.
As a result of what the FDA deemed evasiveness on Eli-Lilly’s part, a significant number of patients experience disruptive brain zaps, severe itching of the skin (paresthesia), and even seizures when ending treatment. Symptoms have been known to last days, weeks, and even months after cessation of the drug.
These sometimes acute episodes of discomfort and trauma have led to disruptions in both work and home lives of numerous patients. The side effects of withdrawal often result in an inability to care for children, loss of income due to being forced to take sick days, excessive medical bills, and more.
Individuals affected by the Cymbalta discontinuation syndrome may want to consider enlisting the help of a reputable drug injury lawyer to recoup some of their losses. An experienced attorney will work to obtain compensation for pain and suffering, medical expenses and more on the client’s behalf.
Each year, Americans file thousands of defective products cases in courtrooms all over the country.
Many consumers have purchased an item only to find out that the merchandise is flawed. At best, the consumer experiences only a mild annoyance or frustration at the poor design, manufacturing error, or confusing user manual. At worst, the defective product can lead to injury or even death. This is especially true when it comes to medications and medical devices.
Defective products cases are generally in three categories:
Faulty design: Example—An auto manufacturer fails to install a release latch inside a vehicle’s trunk.
Manufacturing defect: Example—A range of serial numbers of a light installation kit harbors an uninsulated wire that can cause a fire.
Improper labeling or inadequate instructions: Example—Consumers are confused about the daily- recommended dosage of a vitamin, leading to overdose.
Not all consumer goods lend themselves to a lawsuit. Some items—like a chainsaw, for example—are inherently dangerous or risky to own or operate. A chainsaw could be made safer for use by dulling the blade, but that, of course, would make it ineffective for its intended use.
If you suspect you may have a viable lawsuit based on a faulty consumer item, be sure to retain the product itself along with receipt, user instructions, and packaging. Start a journal to track contact and conversations with the manufacturer. Be sure to keep all medical bills, and take photographs of any injuries.
Should you decide to hire a product liability attorney to represent your interests, choose a lawyer with proven experience and successes in cases like yours.
When a motorist strikes a person riding a bike, bicycle accident lawyers can be helpful in sorting out liability and determining who is at fault. Motorists must be careful when they share the road with riders, as even a slight bump can knock a person to the ground and leave them vulnerable to other traffic. Sadly, though, most collisions involving riders and motorists aren’t just slight bumps, but serious wrecks that often leave lasting injuries.
Bicycle accident lawyers regularly handle cases that concern a “left hook” or “right cross.” A left hook refers to a driver making a left turn into a rider crossing an intersection. A left hook typically occurs when a motorist is not paying attention to the intersection or believes they can cut in front of a rider safely. This is a risky maneuver because a mistake often results in the driver hitting the rider.
A right cross refers to a driver turning right into a bicyclist. This typically happens when a driver does not check their blind spot, or when a motorist believes they can quickly turn in front of the rider. Much like a left hook, a small miscalculation when turning can result in serious injuries for the rider.
Many riders injured by a negligent driver have sought legal counsel in an attempt to recover damages for their injuries.
If you work around cranes, you rely on training, workplace safety procedures, properly functioning equipment and the alertness of coworkers and supervisors to avoid a crane accident. Unfortunately, sometimes one or more of these components designed to ensure your safety and wellbeing fail, often resulting in injury or even death.
In September 2014, more than six million people in the United States worked in construction, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics. Another 213 million were employed in the oil and gas extraction subsector. Each and every day, these hard-working Americans are exposed to risk and the chance that something might go awry with the equipment they need to perform their jobs.
A crane accident causes roughly 22 deaths and 175 injuries each year. Equipment failure and human error are usually to blame. The Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) has identified contact with power lines, equipment turnover or collapse, and a lack of safety procedures as the primary causes of devastating crane incidents.
Although a person’s life or health can never be replaced, an experienced attorney may be able to help in the recovery of financial compensation for those affected by this type of tragedy. No dollar amount can make up for a life-changing injury or the death of a loved one, but monetary damages for pain and suffering, loss of quality of life or companionship, and medical or burial expenses, can significantly ease the burden in the aftermath of a life-changing event.
If you work in one of the Houston area’s many refineries or chemical plants, you face the risk of a chemical explosion on a daily basis. You trust that your employer has safety procedures in place that ensure your wellbeing, that you and your co-workers are equipped with the skills and training needed to perform your jobs safely, and that the equipment that surrounds you is inspected regularly and maintained properly.
However, what if these measures aren’t taken? A chemical explosion happens more often than one would think, and the consequences can be devastating. A tiny leak can lead to the explosion of a storage tank; a miniscule spark can ignite combustible gases; contact with oxygen alone can lead to a violent chemical reaction. Due to the ferocious nature of these events, fatalities are common and injuries severe, often ranging from hearing loss to severed limbs, and worse. Mental health problems like Post Traumatic Stress Disorder may also occur. The injuries sustained are frequently life-altering and long-term, perhaps even permanent.
These accidents are the result of negligence—a company’s failure to enforce safety regulations, equipment malfunction, inattention, or a lapse in maintenance. Many of them are completely preventable if proper safety measures are taken.
If you become the victim of a blast that could have been avoided, you may want to consider discussing your options with a personal injury attorney to protect your rights. The lawyer will examine the evidence and advise you whether or not you have grounds to seek damages to help cover medical bills, loss of income and more.
If your infant was harmed at birth as a result of a medical professional’s error, negligence or malpractice, it may be time to consider the services of a birth injury attorney.
Each year, approximately 28,000 newborns in the United States suffer various types of trauma during pregnancy, at birth, or within the first few hours of life. Unfortunately, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services estimates that as many as 30% of these incidents are entirely preventable.
Some of the events that may lead to harm of an infant include delayed C-sections, unwarranted use of vacuum extraction or forceps, missed signs of fetal distress or excessive use of labor-inducing medications. As a result, some babies may suffer from bruising, shoulder dystocia or infant jaundice, all the way to much more severe conditions like cerebral palsy, hydrocephalus or brachial plexus injury.
Fetal or newborn injury causes tremendous distress to not only the baby, but family members as well. Aside from the infant’s potential physical pain, parents often experience emotional anguish and are saddled with staggering medical expenses that can translate into financial ruin.
A baby’s health is priceless, and no amount of monetary relief can compensate for a child’s wellbeing. It can, however, ease the financial worries of families and provide funds for the child’s ongoing care requirements. In addition, a successful lawsuit holds responsible parties accountable, possibly deterring future negligence by medical personnel.
With proper documentation of events, a birth injury attorney will fight to deliver some much-needed financial peace of mind.
As medicine adds newer and newer technologies to its arsenal, it’s only natural that doctors would begin incorporating technologies like the da Vinci surgical system. This device is used in a variety of laparoscopic and gynecological surgeries, and was originally billed as a safer alternative to traditional surgery. During a procedure, a surgeon controls the device’s movement, and because it can move in ways that a human can’t, it is supposed to be safer. However, many people have been hurt by the system, casting doubt on this claim.
The technology has been implicated in a lot of burn and hemorrhaging injuries, most of them caused by the robot’s uninsulated arms. During surgery, the da Vinci system can accidentally deliver an unchecked electrical burst through these arms, burning internal organs or severing arteries.
Though one current lawsuit claims that the system has significant design flaws, most point to user error as the cause of the injury. When a hospital purchases the technology, the manufacturer, Intuitive Surgical, offers two days of training to hospital personnel. Intuitive claims that this short training period is all that’s required to bring surgeons up to speed, but some doctors who have used the system have claimed that it takes hundreds of uses to get comfortable with the device. As a result, many injuries that have been caused by the system were the result of doctors not familiar with its capabilities.
A big rig collision this afternoon closed all the westbound lanes of the East Freeway near Dell Dale for several hours. Injuries were such that Lifeflight transported a person to the Texas Medical Center. Local authorities are currently investigating the cause of the wreck between the big rig and a van.
The National Highway Traffic and Safety Administration is urging over 4.7 million car owners in the United States to act promptly and repair their air bags. A safety group allegedly linked fours death to air bags manufactured by Takata Corporation, a Japanese auto supplier to Honda, Mazda, Toyota, Nissan, BMW, Ford and general Motors. Apparently, the inflator mechanism may rupture when the air bag is deployed causing metal fragments to explode toward the victim. These automakers have recalled over twelve million vehicles worldwide.